Surgical Care Affiliates, United Surgical Partners International, and DaVita Employee Pay Suppression Illegal “No-Poach” Agreements Class Action
Was your pay suppressed by a "No-Poach" deal?
Law Firm: Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein
Est. Recovery
$500 - $5,000
About this case
If you worked in a skilled role (e.g., Administrator, Group Administrator, Manager, Director, equivalent or more senior titles) at Surgical Care Affiliates (SCA), United Surgical Partners International (USPI), or DaVita, contact Lieff Cabraser. A consolidated federal class action—Dean M. Harvey is Court‑appointed Co‑Lead Counsel—alleges SCA, SCA Holdings, SCAI Holdings, Andrew Hayek, UnitedHealth Group, USPI, United Surgical Partners Holding Company, Tenet Healthcare, DaVita, and Kent Thiry violated the Sherman Act by entering illegal no‑poach agreements that criminally suppressed employees’ compensation and mobility. Federal indictments allege SCA conspired with other health‑care companies (and later DaVita) to suppress competition for senior employees; the complaint alleges SCA and USPI agreed not to solicit skilled employees from at least May 2010–Oct 2017 and that SCA and DaVita had a similar no‑solicit pact from at least Feb 2012–July 2017.
Do you qualify?
Join this case via Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernsteins intake form.